What are the implications of “seeing the future”? If even one second of the future can be said to exist then there is no sufficient reason to deny that the whole of the future already exists. Moreover, this would have been true at any instant in the past. In other words, if the future already exists then there is no such thing as past, present and future and there is no such thing as becoming; everything has already become. Indeed, that has always been true. It is a return to the position of Parmenides that all change is illusory. Strangely, a number of modern philosophers and scientists subscribe to this position. Consider these quotations by Einstein:
1) “People like us, who believe in physics, know that the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”
2) Since there exist in this four-dimensional structure [space-time] no longer any sections which represent “now” objectively, the concepts of happening and becoming are indeed not completely suspended, but yet complicated. It appears therefore more natural to think of physical reality as a four dimensional existence, instead of, as hitherto, the evolution of a three dimensional existence.
3) Time is only an illusion. The existence of the future follows from Minkowski`s World of space-time.
4) There is no difference between the past and the future in the 4-dimensional space-time-world. The present is only an illusion.
If Einstein is right (and many physicists share his views although they are completely unable to address the philosophical consequences), then our lives are futile, pointless, and incomprehensible. We have no free will, there is no evolution or becoming, and everything has already happened and is cast in stone.
Michael Talbot, in The Holographic Universe, wrote: “[Loye] believes that reality is a giant hologram, and in it the past, present, and future are indeed fixed, at least up to a point. The rub is that it is not the only hologram. There are many such holographic entities floating in the timeless and spaceless waters of the implicate [universe], jostling and swimming around one another like so may amoebas. ‘Such holographic worlds could also be visualized as parallel worlds, parallel universes,’ says Loye. Thus, the future of any given holographic universe is predetermined, and when a person has a precognitive glimpse of the future, they are tuning into the future of that particular hologram only. But, like amoebas, these holograms also occasionally swallow and engulf each other, melding and bifurcating like the protoplasmic globs of energy that they really are. Sometimes these jostlings jolt us and are responsible for the premonitions that from time to time engulf us. And when we act upon a premonition and appear to alter the future, what we are really doing is leaping from one hologram to another. Loye calls these intra holographic leaps ‘hololeaps’ and feels that they are what provides us with out true capacity for both insight and freedom.”
In order to solve the problem of apparent precognition – seeing and knowing the future – such theories introduce even more severe problems. If there are infinite parallel worlds, and infinite versions of “me”, which is the real me? When I “hololeap” from one parallel world to another, all of my doppelgangers are presumably doing exactly the same. Could ten of us all hololeap to the same parallel world, the one that seems to have the best future? How would we all co-exist in the same world, or in the same mind? This type of thinking is absurd, incoherent and bordering on the crazy.
Let’s be clear. The future hasn’t happened. No one can see future events for the simple reason that they don’t exist yet. How can you “see” non-existence? Nor do we have multiple selves busily transferring consciousness from one parallel world to another.
Physicist David Bohm expressed a far more sensible and logic alternative: “When people dream of accidents correctly and do not take the plane or ship, it is not the actual future that they were seeing. It was merely something in the present which is implicate and moving toward making that future. In fact, the future they saw differed from the actual future because they altered it. Therefore I think it’s more plausible to say that, if these phenomena exist, there’s an anticipation of the future in the implicate order in the present. As they used to say, coming events cast their shadow in the present. Their shadows are being cast deep in the implicate order.”
In 1966 in Wales, a terrible disaster occurred in the mining village of Aberfan. 116 children died when a mountain of coal waste slipped, engulfing the nearby school. Apparently people all over Britain, and indeed in the wider world, had dreamt of the catastrophe. The first dreams began weeks earlier, and occurred with greater frequency in the lead up to the accident. Physicist Gerald Feinberg attempted to account for the Aberfan precognitions by saying that anyone who read a newspaper in the aftermath of the disaster could have ‘produced a trace in his brain which went back before it happened, so that he could remember it before it took place.’
However, if this outlandish suggestion were accurate, why didn’t it apply to every other great disaster, particularly earthquakes and tsunamis which have killed hundreds of thousands, and, above all, to 9/11, the most publicized disaster in history?
Bohm was correct when he said, “There’s an anticipation of the future in the implicate order in the present.” The Aberfan situation was all too predictable. The coal waste had become the equivalent of snow, ready to create an avalanche. There may have been several small slippages previously. Someone in the village may have subconsciously predicted what was coming. Their subconscious became more insistent, flooding their dreams with dark images and forebodings. Others then tuned into that person’s powerful dreams via the interconnected r = 0 domain. A “dream contagion” erupted. Sensitive dreamers all over the world started to have similar dreams. But none of it was precognition; it was all prediction. Earthquakes and tsunamis are of course much harder to predict, and 9/11 was a complete surprise to everyone other than those that planned it.
As for the “chair test”, here is an entirely different interpretation that is remarkable in its own right but involves no precognition.
Step 1) The psychic practitioner tunes into the r = 0 domain where all mental phenomena are interconnected.
Step 2) He makes a connection with the mind of the experimenter and extracts all of the data present in the experimenter’s thoughts concerning the forthcoming event.
Step 3) He scans the r = 0 domain for anyone whose thoughts contain information about the same event.
Step 4) When he locates a “match”, he then places the seat number in the person’s mind as a subconscious suggestion.
Step 5) The person goes to the event, and when he arrives in the auditorium, his subconscious prompts him to seek the chair number that has already been implanted in his subconscious.
Step 6) The person sits in the chair, the experimenter notes the person’s description and realizes to his astonishment that the description exactly matches the one provided earlier by the psychic. He concludes that the psychic has seen the future.
Of course, the psychic didn’t see the future: he constructed it, using information and processes available to him (and indeed everyone else) via the r = 0 domain.
The Power of the Subconscious
British illusionist Derren Brown, who does not accept the existence of paranormal phenomena of any kind, frequently uses subconscious suggestion in his act. A typical stunt he might perform is to draw a picture of a circle, place it in an envelope, seal it and then ask someone to “read his mind” and draw the picture he placed inside the envelope. However, he has pre-prepared the environment in which the performance is taking place. It is full of circular motifs and designs. When he speaks to the person whom he wishes to “mind read” he makes subtle circular gestures with his hands while he’s speaking, and he subtly drops in references to circles. He might draw a circle in the air as he says to the other person, “Look into my eyes. Let your thoughts go round and round. Concentrate on my thoughts. See the image in my mind. Keep going round and round, making smaller and smaller circles until you focus directly on the object I drew on the paper.”
He has used verbal and visual cues to prime the other person’s subconscious. The other person will definitely draw a picture of a circle because his subconscious is now full of that image. Nothing paranormal has happened. The person’s subconscious has been manipulated, that’s all. It happens to us all the time. Advertising is based on the manipulation of our subconscious.
Try it for yourself. Get a friend to come round to your house for a “telepathy” experiment. Their task is to guess five objects that you will, allegedly, mentally project at them, and which you have written down, placed in an envelope and given to them to hold. In fact, you will prime their subconscious beforehand. Choose a geometric shape (a square, say) a fruit (e.g. an orange), a number (e.g. 7), an animal (e.g. a lion) and a celebrity (e.g. Britney Spears). Seed the room with various items and clues that would be suggestive of the five objects. Seed your comments with subtle references to the chosen objects. If you perform the task with anything like the skill of Derren Brown, your friend will correctly “guess” all five items and be suitably amazed. Of course, there’s no magic involved – just the priming of the pre-conscious mind.
Derren Brown’s stunts are an example of local “psychic” priming i.e. clues in the local physical environment are used to prime the subject’s psyche to obtain the desired result.
But we are saying that non-local psychic priming is also possible, where one person, via the r = 0 domain, is able to directly prime the pre-conscious mind of another, as in the chair test.
It may be the case that many human beings once had non-local psychic abilities, but such people would, in past ages, have been those most likely to be accused of witchcraft and black magic, persecuted and killed. The genes for “psychic” powers would not have flourished in the gene pool thanks to religious fanaticism and fear of anything different. How many so-called witches were actually just psychically gifted women?
The sad reality is that humanity operates at a low level of consciousness. We are preoccupied with the basics of life: food, drink, shelter, sex, family, relationships, friendship, job, entertainment, being “acceptable”. Our spirituality is close to zero. Most of us accept the “system” – the means by which the Elite control us. Most of us have no grand vision of human potential. We don’t spend much time thinking about politics, philosophy or religion. We accept whatever our parents and the leaders of society put in front of us. We don’t ask questions, we don’t challenge authority, we don’t demand real change.
We’re lazy, apathetic and we pursue the path of least resistance. In truth, we are not really awake. We go through life on a sort of autopilot that is highly successful at addressing our petty basic needs but useless at raising and expanding our consciousness. The mindset the human autopilot generates is a barrier to enlightenment. Our Higher Self, our connection to the divine aspect of the universe, is as far away and hidden from us as ever. Our human Autopilot couldn’t care less about making us divine: it would much rather post pictures on Facebook, crack bad jokes and contemplate Megan Fox.
Even though the world contains innumerable wonders, the vast majority of us still manage to be thoroughly bored much of the time. We live a robotic existence far below our true potential. Quite simply, there is something wrong with our consciousness. It fails to link with our higher capabilities. Only rarely do we feel truly energized, and often its with the help of mind-altering drugs – shouldn’t we be trying to be energized all of the time, without any drugs?
We have to upgrade our consciousness, banish the Autopilot that makes us plod through life like the undead. Perhaps instead of making movies about robots developing human consciousness, we should concentrate on why so many humans have developed a robot “consciousness”.
If we want to escape from our zombie, autopilot lives, we have to break down all of the rituals, routines and conventions of our everyday existence. Once you start to challenge everything you have been told by “society”, you start to feel a tremendous surge of energy. You see immense possibilities opening for the whole of humanity. This website contains many articles challenging all of the conventional wisdom of our world. It provides a wide-ranging set of techniques for analyzing the lies fed to us by the Elite. It’s possible to deconstruct everything they say and expose their sinister underlying agenda. Anyone who takes onboard the philosophy espoused by this website will never again be fooled by the Elite. This site is the antidote to Autopilot Humanity.
A fully awake humanity would be a cosmic glory. We can get there if we reject all of those who want us to stay asleep forever. Above all, the Elite do not want us to wake up because that would mean the end of their dominion over us, so they give us soporifics, sedatives and narcotics to keep us asleep.
The Illuminati often refer to the concept of Diabolus est Deus Inversus: The Devil is God Reversed. The Elite have set themselves up as God, but they are in fact the diabolic reverse – the Devil. They follow the example of the Demiurge who believes himself to be God but is the dialectical opposite. Humanity cannot awake from its slumbers until it learns to understand that most of those who wear the mantle of the divine are much more interested in making themselves kings of the world. If humanity’s rulers are enormously and obscenely wealthier than those they rule, shouldn’t the obvious conclusion be drawn? – that they are using their power to enrich themselves, not to enrich humanity. Everything they say is a lie. Everything they say should be reversed. Humanity’s rulers should never be excessively wealthy. That should be the Law.
Have another look at the Riemann sphere since it provides a good conceptual model for thinking about paranormal phenomena.
Imagine the north pole of the Riemann sphere to be the r = 0 dimensionless point, the Singularity. This is the Universal Mind outside space and time. But then imagine the Riemann sphere itself as a projection of the Mind Singularity, a “virtual” mind that can be portrayed as an enfolded dimensional entity sitting on top of an unfolded 2-D plane (as a simplified representation of the physical universe).
Imagine that we are objects on the 2-D plane and that we are linked to the Mind Singularity via a narrow “thought cone” (a straight line, initially) running straight through the virtual mind. This represents the mental connection between ourselves (in the physical universe) and the Universal Mind. It is our consciousness. Our unconscious is the rest of the sphere. In other words, our consciousness and our unconscious together compose the entire sphere, the whole virtual mind – the Mind of God.
The more we illuminate our unconscious mind, the closer we get to God. If we could illuminate our entire unconscious we would become God. Gnosis is defined as the point of “no return”: our human consciousness has expanded to the point at which, in one wondrous instant, we suddenly “get it”, we get everything. All of the remaining unconscious material is instantly absorbed. Our mind has gone critical, like a fission reactor. A chain reaction is initiated that instantaneously bridges the gap between mortal and divine mind in one immense and irreversible mental “explosion” of enlightenment. The darkness of our ignorance is swept away in an overwhelming flash of illumination, like the moment of Biblical Creation: Let there be Light! It is our individual Omega Point, where we have traversed the path of knowledge from Alpha (human) to Omega (divine).
The path of “faith” is a false trail laid by the Demiurge to ensure that we never reach the true path of knowledge. Hasn’t it always been obvious? – those who walk the path of faith are blind, ignorant fanatics. They think that one ancient book can “save” them. If I wanted to keep the human population permanently ignorant, what would I do? I would give them a single book that contained no knowledge and I would tell them that it was the infallible Word of God and that to disobey a single word was to court eternal damnation. Generation after generation would read this dumb, worthless book and learn nothing, “see” nothing and never advance towards divinity. They would be my permanent slaves.
That book has already been written. It comes with three names: the Torah, the Bible, the Koran. It is the Word of Satan. You could not be further removed from enlightenment if you fall under the spell of the Demiurge’s magnum opus, the Book of Lies.
Although our “thought cone” of consciousness is, for the vast majority of us in our normal lives, restricted to inside our own head, it is always accompanied by a “aureole” i.e. we all have access to an area around us that we can tune into; we can widen our thought cone to enter the minds of everything in our local vicinity. How do we become aware that someone nearby is staring at us? Without raising our head to look, we are suddenly seized by a sense that someone is studying us intently. We look up and, sure enough, we catch someone staring.
How could we possibly have known they were looking? It’s because they have entered our mental space. They have mentally tapped us on the shoulder, so to speak. Their aureole has overlapped with ours. They are not doing anything sophisticated such as reading our thoughts. But they could if they put their mind to it. That’s what an intuitive person does; he scans the other person’s thoughts and rapidly acquires the “big picture” of who they are. He learns details of certain important events in their lives that dominate their consciousness. It comes to him effortlessly. He barely knows he’s doing it.
Here is an example of two friends with a straightforward psychic connection i.e. they can make their mental aureoles overlap and thus see into each other’s minds via the r = 0 domain.
“A friend and I decided to test our ‘psychic link’ and wished to find out if we could communicate an object to each other with no words whatsoever. We were aware of how easy it would be to manipulate each other with words or actions so to make this experiment controlled, we used neither.
I proceeded to think of something and when I had, I told her I was ready and I held the picture of that object in my head. At this stage I will tell you that I was thinking of a pineapple plant. We spent 5-10 minutes in silence with each other, me holding this pineapple plant image in my head and her attempting to ‘see it’.
Now the very fact is, after about 10 mins she asked if it was a spider-plant and I said no. She asked if it was a yukka plant and I said no. Then she just sat back exasperated and said, ‘Well I don’t know what it is. All I can see is this spiky green plant but I don’t know what it is or what it is called!’ Now I had not thought about this at all. I know what a pineapple plant looks like having grown them in the tropics, however my friend has never seen a pineapple plant and when she got this ‘mental picture’ she had no word to describe what she was ‘seeing’ because she had never seen a pineapple plant before.
So in this experiment, I did not use any words whatsoever to ‘manipulate’ my friend’s ability to ‘see’ what I was thinking. In fact this experiment was a real diamond because it didn’t even occur to me that she would not know the name of the plant she was ‘seeing’. She saw this spiky plant, gave me some names of spiky plants she knew but of course did not come up with the name of this plant because she had never seen one before, she didn’t even know how pineapples grow (most UK residents don’t of course, we don’t grow them!).”
Now, the fact that the person “seeing” the image wasn’t able to identify it as a pineapple plant is interesting because, of course, if you can see an image in another person’s mind why not also the word or name that goes with it? The answer is that mental images are predominantly right brain while words and language are predominantly left brain. The right brain is much easier to link to in the r = 0 domain than the left brain. The stronger the psychic link, the better able the person is at linking to both hemispheres of the brain, and getting words and images.
An expert psychic can mind read over long distances and on a highly sophisticated basis. He can “read” people half a world away. He is able to extend the aureole of his thought cone to cover them and establish a powerful mental connection that gives full access to their thoughts. Such people are exceptionally rare.
Others who are likely to be able to establish strong remote connections are lovers, parents and their children, siblings and, especially, identical twins. Such connections will be even more likely in times of great stress and crisis when the unconscious dramatically opens up to signal extreme distress.
Seeing the Future
Consider another example of supposed precognition, formulated by Dr Dean Radin, which involves randomly showing either ‘calm’ or emotionally charged pictures to a subject.
The subject presses a mouse button, causing a computer to randomly select a photo from a large collection of emotionally significant and emotionally neutral photos, but, for five seconds, it shows only a blank screen. Then the selected photo is shown for three seconds before again being replaced by a blank screen for five seconds, and then a rest period of a further five seconds before the whole process begins again. The subject is wired up to record her physiological responses.
What Radin discovered was that the subject reacted strongly to emotionally charged pictures before they were displayed. How could the subject know that an emotional picture was about to be shown rather than a calm one? Only, Radin reasoned, if the subject had foreknowledge.
Once again, this interpretation is erroneous. The experimental set-up ensures that the selected photo is ready to be displayed a full five seconds before it actually is. The photo is within the subject’s mental aureole during that time and all the information it contains is already available to the subject via the non-local r = 0 domain. In other words, the subject isn’t seeing the future but reacting to knowledge of the present. The subject has already “seen” the picture by the time it is formally displayed, so her prior emotional response is in no way surprising.
These examples show the power of the r = 0 domain. It provides the solutions for otherwise baffling phenomena.
We received a message a few weeks ago from someone who had just read the article entitled The Celestial Human.
He said, “I read the latest article this morning. From the bottom of my heart, something weird happened yesterday in relation to it. It made me compelled to try and get your opinion on it, something that I would have entirely dismissed on scientific grounds before.
I was sitting in my back garden, thinking about the implications of Illumination, as has dominated every second of thinking time for the last couple of weeks. The sun was directly in my face and as I sat there, I noticed out of the corner of my eye those tiny raindrop-like multicoloured balls of light reflecting off the tips of my eyelashes.
I started staring at the little orbs of light, admiring the spectrum of colours. At this point, I was in a sort of inanimate, trance like state. I was aware of this though, I was conscious of the fact I could snap myself out of it at any time, so it wasn’t similar to meditation or anything, simply deep in thought, concentrating intensely on the balls of light.
Now can I just say at this point, I would normally attribute the following to some sort of scientific reasoning, whereby some sort of trick of the light and my eyes combine to give the effect I experienced. However I am neither scientist nor Illuminatus, so I have little specific information on which to draw to make sense of what I saw.
As I concentrated on the light, forcing my eyes to stare at it, a feeling which I can only describe as my eyes ‘ glossing over ‘ happened. The longer I stared, there was stuff kind of ‘formulating inside’ the light, yet it was entirely independent to it. It’s so hard to describe, but I’ll do my best. It felt like it was constantly there, I just had to ‘look’ hard to actually see it. I could see the grass behind these strange transparent images in the light, but was fully concentrating on them.
It’s like transparent film of gray coloured stringy blobs, that looks similar to bacteria when magnified, gliding around smoothly like its sitting on a surface of water. The blobs, the more you look at them, resemble infinitely complicated hieroglyphics, although they are more similar to crazy, random blobs of bacteria. This sheet of ‘hieroglyphics’ moves with my eyes, but independently when I concentrate on a fixed point, washing around the point my eyes are focused on.
I have experienced this weird stringy blob stuff gliding in my vision before now, but never made an effort to concentrate on it, never have actually been in a situation where I could concentrate on a ‘fixed blob of light’, like I was yesterday.
The longer I stared, now totally transfixed by this weird substance, I realised there were sometimes one, sometimes several, ‘eyes’ moving around in the sea of hieroglyphics. They are different to the other, grey stingy blob stuff though, they had CLEAR black pupils and a black outside rim, total blocks of solid colour, with grey where the white would be, a definite image (which made me think there is more to it than reflections in my eye). They were perfect circles, so it couldn’t possibly have been a reflection of my own pupil, I don’t think.
I stared at this weird sea of stuff for ages, stared at the eyes flitting about with the mad shapes and patterns the blob stuff made. The eyes were actually ‘fixed’ into points of the blob stuff, they were moving with the substance, in a set place, yet looked out of place, sharp, clear and contrastual to the nondescript, gray, transparent moving sheet of ‘bacteria’ like stuff.
When I returned to my room inside my house, I walked in and on itunes, out of 3165 songs, ‘ The Matrix ‘ by oxide and neutrino was playing about a minute through. The first thing I heard on walking in was the part in the song, where it says: ‘ free your mind ‘ in a soulful voice and consequently quotes the bit from the Matrix where the little girl says, ‘ it is us that bends, not the spoon ‘ before the song drops into drum and base. Now I would have viewed that as PURE coincidence a few weeks ago, now I’m not sure, but i still feel like an idiot for even considering the possibility that it was no accident.
After I read your article today, and saw the picture of the ‘god particle’ at the end, that so closely resembled the eye shapes which I can see in the light, I had to contact you and ask.
As I’m sure you know, I am an skeptical person, and I still can’t entirely accept that everything said by you guys is true, because I haven’t seen the proof; despite how good, cohesive and rational it sounds in theory. I’m sure you accept that, I think it’s a reasonable outlook, faith gets you nowhere.
However, the events of yesterday were strange and I think significant after seeing the article today. I mean, what are the chances even of that experience yesterday happening, and then you release that article detailing an image of the god particle the very next morning?
I don’t know what to make of what I saw. If it’s sunny today, I’m going to try and concentrate on the light and find that weird sea of stuff again so I can concentrate even better. This is about as close to ‘paranormal’ as I’ve ever got, yet could be something very simply explained, I just don’t know.
I have attached pictures of the ‘eyes’ that I saw, to help you see the similarity between it and the particle, and an image of bacteria to display what the grey substance resembles.
Instinct tells me it’s something to do with your ‘god particle’, the light, red and blue, but at the moment they are all separate theories that do not connect in my own head, pieces of a jigsaw.
I might be totally wrong, a wandering fool in the desert of knowledge, but all I can do is keep walking.
Let’s highlight a couple of points here:
1) When I returned to my room inside my house, I walked in and on itunes, out of 3165 songs, ‘ The Matrix ‘ by oxide and neutrino was playing about a minute through. The first thing I heard on walking in was the part in the song, where it says: ‘ free your mind ‘ in a soulful voice and consequently quotes the bit from the Matrix where the little girl says, ‘ it is us that bends, not the spoon ‘ before the song drops into drum and base. Now I would have viewed that as PURE coincidence a few weeks ago, now I’m not sure, but i still feel like an idiot for even considering the possibility that it was no accident.
This is no coincidence. His subconscious was aware that this tune was playing, and actually timed his return so that he would enter the house at precisely the right moment to hear the quote from The Matrix. His subconscious is actually prompting him to be less skeptical – to open his mind. And it worked!
2) However, the events of yesterday were strange and I think significant after seeing the article today. I mean, what are the chances even of that experience yesterday happening, and then you release that article detailing an image of the god particle the very next morning?
The chances are close to zero. Because he was concentrating so hard on the subject of Illumination, he had actually managed to tune into the thoughts of the Illuminatus preparing the latest article. At the forefront of the mind of the Illuminatus was the image of the “God Particle” – the Monad, the small black circle at the centre of a large white circle, reminiscent of the pupil of the eye. It is with that profound image that the article concludes. It is one of the most revered and potent images used by the Illuminati.
Never underestimate the power of the subconscious. We encourage people to try to find a “rational”, skeptical explanation of strange phenomena that they encounter. But if you have run out of conventional options, do not turn away from an underlying, more mysterious, deeper rationality – that, ultimately, of the Mind of God.
The Akashic Record
In esoteric circles, mention is often made of the “Akashic record”. This is a repository of everything that has ever happened, and which the most gifted psychics are said to be able to access: they are able to “read” this record and obtain information about the past that is not available from any other source. The Illuminati identify it with the r = 0 domain, the Cosmic Mind and its associated cosmic memory.
One of the most remarkable books ever written is one to which we have referred previously in our article The Right Brain God. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind by Julian Jaynes asserts that consciousness is based on language and hence, before the existence of language, there was no such thing as consciousness! We do not typically consider non-human animals (none of which has anything that we would describe as a formal language) as conscious in any meaningful way. Nor can human babies be considered conscious before they learn language (hence why we have no conscious memories of being babies). If you want to know what an animal’s mind is like then simply ponder a newly born baby’s mind. The baby does things, and seems curious and so on, yet nothing conscious is taking place in its mind. Pure instinct is in control.
Jaynes probably wasn’t aware that his hypothesis was proposed by Friedrich Nietzsche long before. Nietzsche argued that consciousness is proportionate to the capacity for communication, which in turn is proportionate to the need for communication. “Consciousness is really only a net of communication between human beings; it is only as such that it had to develop; a solitary human being who lived like a beast of prey would not have needed it…In brief, the development of language and the development of consciousness go hand in hand…It was only as a social animal that man acquired self-consciousness – which he is still in the process of doing, more and more.”
Hegel was the first to understand that self-consciousness – the ability to reflect on one’s own consciousness – could only arise from the interaction of at least two separate consciousnesses. Nietzsche realized that communication was therefore necessary between the two consciousnesses, and communication relies on some kind of language common to both consciousnesses.
Jaynes argued that civilization and consciousness are linked. Increasing civilization implies increased communication, hence increased sophistication of language. As language grows more complex, so does consciousness. But given that human language is now largely fixed, language can no longer offer any increase in human consciousness. Now the task of humanity is to throw light on the vast unconscious and bring it into consciousness. That is an entirely different endeavour from learning language. It requires a different society and mindset. It needs a Spiritual Humanity, a Humanity of the Psyche, rather than a consumerist and materialistic humanity where consciousness revolves around satisfying petty needs of survival and comfort.
Before the advent of language, humans were not introspective and self-reflective. They did not plan, they simply acted. Jaynes’s radical hypothesis is that they were told what to do by the “gods”. They heard voices in their heads giving them simple, forceful orders: do this, do that, do the other. This, Jaynes suggested, is the same mechanism that underlies the “voices” heard by mystics such as Joan of Arc and by epileptics and schizophrenics. He said that the “gods” were what we now refer to as hallucinations. It has been suggested that Moses, Jesus and Mohammed may have heard such voices in their heads and wrongly attributed them to God.
Jaynes proposed that pre-conscious humanity was guided by what he called the bicameral mind. Bicameral means “two-chambered” and refers to the fact that the human brain is divided into two hemispheres. Jaynes argued that human nature was “split in two, an executive part called a god, and a follower part called a man. Neither part was conscious.” This bicameral mind was most evident and effective in times of stress.
Jaynes asserted that schizophrenia can be considered “a vestige of bicamerality, a relapse to the bicameral mind.” There was a time therefore when all human beings were effectively schizophrenic, but because this was “normal” it wasn’t a problem.
Jaynes said, “Another advantage of schizophrenia, perhaps evolutionary, is tirelessness…they show less fatigue than normal persons and are capable of tremendous feats of endurance…They may move about day and night, or work endlessly without any sign of being tired…This suggests that much fatigue is a product of the subjective conscious mind, and that bicameral man, building the pyramids of Egypt, the ziggurats of Sumer, or the gigantic temples at Teotihuacan with only hand labor, could do so far more easily than could conscious self-reflective men…A further thing that schizophrenics do ‘better’ than the rest of us…is simple sensory perception. They are more alert to visual stimuli…Indeed, schizophrenics are almost drowning in sensory data.”
The extraordinary implication of this statement is that if we could switch off our consciousness, we would massively increase our physical capabilities.
On the subject of modern schizophrenia, Jaynes concluded, “In effect, [the schizophrenic] is a mind bared to his environment, waiting on gods in a godless world.”
Jaynes also made the remarkable suggestion that we are inclined to seek gods in order that they can give us orders and remove from us the responsibility for taking decisions. This is why we are obsessed with the “successful”: with the super-rich, celebrities, the leaders of society. They are the “gods” we lost when the bicameral mind eventually broke down and was replaced by consciousness. Deep down, we have a craving for the inner voice of the gods to command us. In other words, not only are we NOT expanding our consciousness, many of us actually have a strong desire to become LESS conscious and revert to our bicameral heritage. That is exactly what the Elite desire. They want to be the gods whose orders we slavishly obey. They are the executives and we are the followers. They are the masters and we the slaves. That is how our society is configured: a power hierarchy, a status tree. Make no mistake, to address this we seek the COMPLETE DESTRUCTION of the Elite. That means dismantling all of the power structures that rule our society. Privilege would be abolished instantly. The ability of anyone to acquire massive wealth and power would be abolished. Any mechanism that allows any person to wear the mantle of a king of the world would be abolished.
The Illuminati are in the business of expanding human consciousness to divine levels and that necessitates the elimination of the bicameral tendency in humanity i.e. the desire to be dictated to by others. No human who wants to become God can have any desire to slavishly obey any other person. The Illuminati seek to build a community of gods where none command and none obey, where the community cooperates intelligently for the good of all and to the harm of none. We promote independence of mind and self-sufficiency so that no one is reliant on others.
Kings and queens, princes and princesses, aristocrats and nobles, lords and ladies, privileged dynastic families, presidents and prime ministers, generals and admirals, chief executives and directors – all of the people who comprise the Elite – they reflect the bicameral past of humanity. It is time we moved into the future. Power structures and status trees are an offence to humanity and must be dismantled. Humanity cannot reach its full potential until it has got rid of these false gods.
As Jaynes pointed out, speech areas are all located in the left hemisphere of the brain (for right-handed people). He said, “The language of men was involved with only one hemisphere to leave the other free for the language of gods.” He asked the question, “Is it possible to think of the two hemispheres of the brain almost as two individuals, only one of which can speak, while both can listen and both understand?”
He suggested that the human fascination with idols originates in their ability to help us to hallucinate the voices of the gods i.e. if the gods were silent we could encourage them to speak by appealing to the statues and idols of them that we had constructed.
Jaynes said, “Hesiod speaks of a golden race of men who preceded his own generation and became the ‘holy demons upon the earth, beneficent, averters of ills, guardians of mortal men.'”
In the bicameral age, the “gods” authorized our actions. Now we must authorize them ourselves.
Jaynes argued that our religious inclinations are a direct result of our bicameral heritage. How else to characterize the voices in our heads as anything other than gods? And, in the modern age, to hear voices is to suffer from schizophrenia.
Schizophrenics are said to describe feelings of being at one with the entire universe, where all boundaries between themselves and others have collapsed, but that leads them to think that their thoughts are no longer private, and nor are anyone else’s: everyone can read everyone else’s mind. Time crumbles. Schizophrenics behave without conscious awareness. Their mental space starts to vanish. This is exactly what would happen in the r = 0 domain if no one could protect their “private space” with appropriate boundaries. Arguably, consciousness itself, the human “reducing valve”, is our primary mechanism for building a private space that, in normal circumstances, is ours alone.
Schizophrenics hear voices of impelling importance criticizing them and telling them what to do. In a way, it’s the equivalent of Freud’s stern Superego vocalizing itself, and always finding fault. The Superego could be said to be a vestige of the old gods.
People on the autistic spectrum also have an inability to understand that their thoughts are private. They don’t attribute separate minds to others. They struggle to accept that they themselves have separate minds.
It is possible that bicameral humanity resembled an ant colony. A guiding intelligence (taking the role of the Queen in an ant colony) sent out messages to all of the people who carried out their roles like worker and soldier ants, doing whatever was necessary for the good of the community. They had very little initiative or sense of self. A whole tribe in primeval times could have been organized in this way. The people were easily led, docile, submissive and looking for powerful figures to provide leadership. So, what’s new? The Elite rely on this primal mentality that leaves so many people incapable of resisting them.
Many people are addicted to being led. It is an addiction that must be overcome if there is to be a society of gods i.e. humanity at it finest, noblest, best. No one should ever kowtow to another, bend a knee or kiss a ring. The days of authoritarian societies, of pyramid structures and power hierarchies are drawing to an end. Do we accept human equality, or don’t we? It’s a very simple question. If we do then there is no room for any sort of enshrined Elite. Everyone on earth has to be given a proper chance to rise as high as their natural abilities can take them. For that to be possible, the whole panoply of privilege in which our world has been disastrously enmeshed must be abolished. There must be an unprecedented redistribution of wealth from the Elite to the people, and no one ever again should be allowed to commandeer disproportionate assets. That is the gospel of the Illuminati, of meritocracy.
The world could change forever in the next second if everyone everywhere simply woke up and said, “WTF!!…why am I participating in a system that allows stock market speculators who are destabilizing the global economy to take home a billion dollars a year and become the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world?” We could stop this farce at any time if we had the guts. But who does? We could stop the super rich in an instant. We could make excessive wealth illegal. Why don’t we? Because we are the puppets of the super rich and we’re scared of them. We let them set the agenda. We allow ourselves to be victims.
Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), also known as Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), is an extraordinary condition in which two or more distinct personalities can be present in a single body. This can again be considered a throwback to our bicameral past. Then, we could be said to have two personalities inside us: the god who commanded and the human who obeyed. Someone suffering from MPD might perhaps tune into the r = 0 domain, where all the thoughts and personalities of humanity intersect and intertwine, and choose one or more personalities that suit their particular psychological needs. The other possibility is that they “resurrect” personalities they had in former lives to become their cast of guiding personalities.
It has been observed that each unique MPD personality has a different brainwave pattern. Each personality has its own name, age, talents, memories, gender, race, intelligence, handwriting, language abilities etc.
The phenomenon of the lynch mob, of hysterical crowds, of intoxicated audiences at gigs, sports events, political rallies could be interpreted as bicameral in nature: one person or a small group of people (the “gods”) lead, and everyone else, with unswerving devotion, follows. People are prone to emotional contagion. They can be “infected” by others and swept up into a state nothing like their “normal” selves. Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany had an uncanny gift for making the people bend to his will. He became the embodied Will of the German people. Such spellbinding orators can prove to be gods or devils.
Given that our conscious minds are embedded in the “physical consciousness” of the r > 0 domain, our best chance of having experiences in the r = 0 domain is when we disengage from normal mental states, such as in dreams or meditation, after extreme exertion or stress, after taking certain drugs etc.
In ancient Greece, paranoia (from para & nous) meant, literally, having another’s mind alongside one’s own. It represented a deterioration of consciousness. People did not think for themselves. Rather, thoughts were given to them.
Hypnosis, Consciousness and Gods
Jaynes accounted for hypnosis on the basis that it “engages the general bicameral paradigm which allows a more absolute control over behaviour than is possible with consciousness.”
In other words, hypnosis – always performed by a dominant person who puts the submissive subject “under” – is a return to bicamerality. The person hears the orders of the “god” and carries them out unquestioningly. The hypnotist has taken the place of the ancient gods who spoke to bicameral humans. When we watch a hypnosis show, we are going back in time thousands of years and seeing how our ancestors behaved. Jaynes says, “The more godlike the operator is to the subject, the more easily is the bicameral paradigm activated.”
It is virtually impossible to hypnotize a dominant person, or someone with a very highly developed left-hemisphere brain (a scientist or engineer, for example). Those who are most easily hypnotized are submissives. They are highly suggestible and looking to be dominated.
Ours is an astonishingly submissive culture. Most people are sheep wanting to be led. The Elite encourage the flocking and herding tendencies of the submissive masses. They want a docile, unquestioning population, and they have achieved it. To those of us who are not submissive, phenomena such as celebrity culture are almost incomprehensible. Why would anyone choose to worship another human being? Why would people mould their appearance, mannerisms and the clothes they wear to make themselves more like a celebrity? These are the actions of low self-esteem submissives. It is imperative to enhance the self-esteem of submissives so that they are no longer in thrall to the dominant in society. Submissives desire authoritarian societies. They must be weaned away from their desire to be controlled.
One of the primary reasons for the existence of the Elite is that they fill the bicameral gap. Many people see it as “natural” that there should be strong leaders who help themselves to wealth and power. To create a New World Order, the vestigial submissiveness of so many people has to be addressed. Islam, one of the world’s major religions, is actually based on the concept of submission. It’s what the word means. How could any dominant person ever subscribe to such a weak and feeble religion that demands that people spend their lives on their knees? No dominant person would ever become a Muslim. Even more than Christianity, Islam is a religion for slaves. It’s practically incomprehensible that so many African Americans chose to embrace Islam.
All of the Abrahamic faiths appeal to the submissive. The submissive adore these religions because they love to hear the voice of an authoritarian dictator and tyrant. Why was Adolf Hitler so successful in Nazi Germany? Precisely because he, an utterly dominant individual, made himself a Man-God and all the submissive masses succumbed to his spell. They wanted to be told what to do, to be told whom to love and whom to hate. Women, in particular, were besotted with Hitler. He gave them all the answers. He was masculinity made flesh. He was domination come to life.
Jaynes gives an astonishingly original analysis of the phenomenon of Jesus Christ: “At almost the same time that Iamblichus was teaching the induction of gods into statues, or young illiterate katochoi to ‘participate’ in divinity and have ‘a common energy’ with a god, Athanasius, the competitive Bishop of Alexandria, began by claiming the same thing for the illiterate Jesus. The Christian Messiah had heretofore been regarded as like Yahweh, a demi-god perhaps, half human, half divine, reflecting his supposed parentage. But Athanasius persuaded Constantine, his Council of Nicaea, and most of Christianity thereafter, that Jesusparticipated in Yahweh, was the same substance, the Bicameral Word made Flesh. I think we can say then that the growing church, in danger of shattering into sects, exaggerated the subjective phenomenon of possession into an objective theological dogma. It did so to assert an even greater claim to an absolute authorization. For Athanasian Christians the actual gods had indeed returned to earth and would return again.”
To destroy the Abrahamic faiths it is necessary to eliminate the weakness and submissiveness that afflicts so many people. As Jaynes said, “Why is it that in our daily lives we cannot get up above ourselves to authorize ourselves into being what we really wish to be?”
Music and poetry are right-brain functions and are strongly related to bicameralism, Jaynes said. So, is the power of music over us caused by its weakening effect on the left-brain, and its enhancement of right-brain mysticism? Did people like Jim Morrison become genuine shamans on stage, channelling the r = 0 domain into our conscious lives?
The music of Pythagoras and his companions was famed for its entrancing power. Their instrument was the lyre. Jaynes said, “We thus have some ground for saying that the use of the lyre among early poets was to spread excitation to the divine speech centres.”
In demonic possession, the demon replaces the “god” as the voice being heard by the subject of the possession. In the rite of exorcism, the exorcist subsequently replaces the demon by providing a stronger bicameral voice.
Jaynes characterised Yahweh as a psychotic bicameral voice: “So [Yahweh] prefers Abel to Cain, slays Er, the first-born of Judah, having taken a dislike to him, tells Abraham to beget a son, and then later orders him to kill the son, even as criminal psychotics might be directed today. Similarly, the bicameral voice of Moses has a sudden impulse to kill him (Exodus 4:24) for no reason at all.”
Exodus 4:24-26: At a lodging place on the way, the LORD met Moses and was about to kill him. But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin and touched Moses’ feet with it. “Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me,” she said. So the LORD let him alone.
In this light, the Old Testament is quite literally the story of lunatics possessed by a deranged, psychotic voice. We call that voice the Demiurge: Yahweh, Satan. No sane person could associate that voice with anything other than psychosis. Yet this is supposedly the Word of God!!!!!
If it is true that we are actually more intelligent when we are possessed, what does that imply? It means we are channelling the infinite knowledge of the r = 0 domain.